Tarkus – excerpt

Audio Program

The audio program streaming will be available when purchasing the article.

Download

The audio program download will be available when purchasing the article.

We remind you that the audio fragments embedded in the text are to be used when reading the article without listening to the audio program. All these examples are included in the audio program.


Welcome to the third edition of the Classic of the Month. Today: “Tarkus” by Emerson Lake & Palmer.

When we explored the secrets of Close to the Edge, we examined a piece with is a very tight connection between music and lyrics. Jon Anderson, main composer of the music together with Steve Howe, is also the author of the lyrics. Tarkus on the other hand, was a result of merging two parallel processes. Most of the music with the exception of “Battlefield” was written by Emerson while all the lyrics were written by Greg Lake.

It is a relatively well known fact that Tarkus initially generated friction between Emerson and Lake. According to Emerson:

“When I showed the piece to Greg he said: “I can’t play that kind of music. If that’s what you want to play, then I think you should look for someone else to play with”.

Lake was finally convinced to give it a shot and the music gradually grew within him, to the point that he developed some of his finest lyrics and included a piece of his own.

As a result of these independent endeavors, Tarkus is quite self-sufficient as an abstract music piece. However, a full interpretation of the conceptual framework behind the piece allows a true rediscovery of this progressive rock masterpiece.

Tarkus is a multi-movement suite, where all the movements, except ”Stones of Years” and “Mass” share common melodic material. There are also other very interesting musical considerations but I will go back to them later in the analysis. Let’s concentrate on the conceptual framework which is what will truly allow us to listen to this piece under a very different light.
There have been different interpretations of what Tarkus represents. Edward Macan, in his book “Rocking the Classics” makes an accurate summary:

“Tarkus can be seen to symbolize a totalitarian society (one thinks of how Big Brother crushed spirituality, individuality, and tradition in Orwell’s 1984); or, equally, Tarkus can be seen to symbolize technology run amok, out of the control of its creators, visiting misery upon all it touches. Perhaps Tarkus can even be seen to represent materialism, which poisons everything around it. None of these readings are mutually exclusive”.

More than non-exclusive, I would say that they complement each other. In fact, here’s another interpretation based on my article “The Cult to the Ephemeral and its Effect on Art”: Tarkus could represent the entertainment society that is devouring culture, transforming it into mass entertainment.

The 11 images in the album’s inner gatefold, created by William Neal, are crucial to creating a framework through which the piece’s concept is conveyed.

The first image represents the opening section “Eruption”. It depicts Tarkus emerging from an egg on the side of an active volcano:

eruption

Notice that Tarkus is really a cybernetic creature, part armadillo and part tank:

tarkus-cover-714x720

It fights, and claims victory, over different cybernetic animals:

battlescene-1

battlescene-2

battlescene-3

battlescene-4

However it is defeated, at least temporarily, by the only creature that is completely biological, the “Manticore”.

manticore

battlefield

This strange figure, mixture of different animals (man, lion, scorpion, among others) is able to sting Tarkus’s left eye, forcing him to retreat.
The final panel is perfectly described by Edward Macan:

aquatarkus

“Tarkus is seen floating down a river on its side; blood appears to be flowing from his head, but its gun turrets still appear operable, so it is hard to say to what if any degree it has been incapacitated.”“Manticore is the first of Tarkus’s foes that is not cybernetic but completely organic. Significantly, while the Manticore is unable to destroy Tarkus, it is at least able to withstand its assaults, to injure it and to drive it into hiding”

“It seems to me that the organic nature of the Manticore holds the key to interpreting the conceptual foundation underlying the Tarkus suite…[…] The Manticore seems to symbolize the “natural” or “spiritually authentic” man or woman – unencumbered by materialism, unbeholden to technology, unafraid of Big Brother.”

The whole suite revolves around this concept. As we will see, the lyrics reflect on the state of mankind and the struggle for human nature to prevail over the diverse forces that are slowly annihilating the sense of individuality in every human being. By the way, this struggle between man and machine is also represented in Karn Evil 9, which we will analyze in a future program.

It is no coincidence that the concepts behind “Close to the Edge” and “Tarkus” share many common views. CTTE is more spiritual and Tarkus more political, but they all point in the same direction: warning signs about where political, economic and technological forces can lead us to… Both pieces were written still under the influence of the psychedelic hippie movement; it was losing its grip on society in the early 70’s but still had a strong inertia.

Looking at the piece from a musical structure point of view, the first organizing principle is the juxtaposition of odd-numbered instrumental movements with even-numbered “song” movements. A second organizing principle has to do with the tempo. The first three instrumental sections are fast, whereas the first and third songs are slow – in line with the mournful character of the lyrics. The sharp and ironic lyrics of the second “song” are represented by a faster tempo. The final instrumental section combines a slow tempo – the funeral march – with the recapitulation of the sizzling opening theme.
From an overall perspective, Tarkus is organized following a nested structure:

Inst Fast – Song Slow – Inst Fast – Song Fast – Instr Fast- Song Slow – Instr Fast

So, starting from the middle movement – the only fast song (Mass) – the suite is symmetrical and begins and ends with the same material.

Now let’s look at each of the movements in more detail.

 

Eruption

The music in “Eruption” perfectly depicts the first scene. Its obsessive pattern in 5/4 gives a dynamic representation of what is going on: The rising pressure of the lava generated within the volcano, ends up spitting an egg out of which Tarkus emerges and runs down the hill to destroy everything at sight. One could claim that the lava represents the different forces – sociological, economic, technological – that have created this “entertainment society” devoid of spirit, cultural values, solidarity – who tries to find sense in life by way of a relentless mass consumption. The Tarkus.

The piece starts with a vocal effect. Lake recorded 20 different “ahhs” at different pitches, creating a volcanic mass that explodes into an ostinato figure. Fans with music knowledge frequently refer to this ostinato as a classic example of progressive rock using odd tempos, because the figure is written in 5/8. However, if you followed my explanation on music phrases in the analysis of “Close to the Edge”, you will see that the phrases that build up the melody rather suggest a 4+3+3 or a 4+6. So, this fragment of Tarkus is actually not an accurate example of a 5-beat rhythm. Let’s listen to it:

The form of “Eruption” is:

A – B – A’ – C – A” – C’ – Coda

Here are the beginnings of each section, so you can easily identify them:

The “A” sections are built with different variations of a bass ostinato. The use of ostinato bass figures became a trademark of Emerson’s music. Tarkus is an excellent example of his mastery in the use of this resource. It is introduced in “Eruption” but used in other sections of the suite. Here’s where you can find them in other movements:

Finally, it is interesting to point out that a rhythmic motif is used to relate the B and C sections.

In order to help you identify it, here’s a piano example. The bass note presents the figure and the treble note indicates the beats.

In section B, notice how it is used in the bass:

And then, by the organ, with a rhythm variation:

In section C, the pattern is used but in a compressed format:

And once again compressed, but this time adding two quarter note chords as a way to go back to the 5/4 pattern in A’’:

 

The Stones of Years

As Edward Macan points out, the lyrics of “The Stones of Years” can be summarized with the phrase:

“Tarkus has obliterated cultural tradition.”

“He speaks of time that has been ‘Overgrown, never known’, days that have ‘made you so unwise’”

With this insight, the lyrics are straightforward and require no interpretation:

Has the dawn ever seen your eyes?
Have the days made you so unwise
Realize, you are?

Had you talked to the winds of time,
Then you’d know how the waters rhyme,
Taste of wine,

How can you know where you’ve been?
In time you’ll see the sign
And realize your sin.

Will you know how the seed is sown?
All your time has been overgrown,
Never known.

Have you walked on the stones of years?
When you speak, is it you that hears?
Are your ears full?

You can’t hear anything at all.

The only matter left to interpretation is who are these lyrics addressed to. According to Peter Ford in his master’s thesis, the rhetorical questions in the lyrics are directed at the Tarkus. In my opinion, they are aimed at the listener.

The structure of the movement is:

A-inst-a-B-inst-A-inst-A-coda

I use the lowercase “a” because only 4 measures from “A” are used before entering section “B”. Each sung section is separated by instrumental passages that are based on the same bass pattern. It is interest to point out that this pattern is introduced in the coda of “Eruption”. Let’s listen to some fragments:

This “state of affairs” described in the lyrics is represented by a strange cybernetic artifact that seems to be a building that might very well represent mankind’s current situation:

stones-of-years

Tarkus doesn’t seem to find much trouble in destroying it. It is very small in comparison to him, and the music doesn’t portray a sense of battle, but rather despair.

tarkus

The second victim of “Tarkus” is a cybernetic pterosaur/warplane mutant called “Iconoclast”.

 

Iconoclast

This movement clearly shows the “Tarkus” in all its fury, as it goes about his business of destroying everything at sight. The ostinato figure presented in “Eruption” returns but in diminution (sixteenth notes) to convey the idea of a forceful and dynamic movement. Most of the movement is in 5/8 with intricate changes of tempo showing ELP’s performing abilities at its best.

The initial descending scale, in 2/2, represents the Iconoclast flying down to meet the Tarkus ….. and his defeat.

The form of “Iconoclast” falls into a large binary form. Part “A” includes the bass ostinato while “B” presents a more static bass with occasional ostinato appearing on Emerson’s right hand. Here’s my interpretation of what is going on: During part “A”, the Iconoclast is flying while fire and bullets are spit out of Tarkus’ fiery turrets. He runs at full speed to avoid the Iconoclast attack. Do you want to listen how Tarkus fires at the sky? Here it is:

And how the Iconoclast is shot and falls down to earth:

This event marks the end of part “A” and beginning of “B”. Now Tarkus runs to find where the Iconoclast has landed and stops in front of him. The iconoclast is in the ground, at his mercy. The ostinato figure stops – Tarkus moves in for the kill. The final measures with a breaking rhythm – short and long notes alternating in the bass, quite eloquently describe the final struggle before the Iconoclast is put to rest.

 

Mass

Although it may appear that the title refers to a Roman Catholic liturgical celebration, my interpretation of the lyrics is that

If you want to read the rest of the article, you need to buy it:

 More information

Resources

This analysis would not have been possible without the solid foundation laid by these two academic works:

“Rocking the Classics” by Edward Macan. Oxford University Press. 1997.

“The Compositional Style of Keith Emerson in Tarkus”. Master’s thesis presented to the School of Graduate Studies – Department of Music – Indiana State University. Peter T. Ford. August 1994.

If you have music theory knowledge and want to delve deeper in the harmonic, melodic, intervallic, modal and rhythmic world of Keith Emerson, I thoroughly recommend that you read Mr. Ford’s thesis.

All music examples have been taken from the Steven Wilson remix published in 2012. It is not better than the original, just different. It highlights details that were hidden or even omitted in the original mix. This box set is not easy to find at an affordable price. If you want it, drop me a line at contact@phaedrus.es and I will connect you to the right guy.

All the illustrations are taken from my personal copy of the Tarkus vinyl edition that I purchased around 1975.

Background music

The background music has been based on a selection of works by different Japanese bands:

  • “Aurora” from the album “The Earth Explorer” by “The Earth Explorer
  • “Puyol” from the album “QUI” by “QUI
  • “Minamo Ni Tsuki” from the album “QUI” by “QUI
  • “Shadow Picture” from the album “Five Evolved from Nine” by “Ain Soph

 
Here’s a link to the Tarkus score.

There is an excellent orchestral version of Tarkus. This video offers several movements of the suite:

This is the full orchestral version (only audio):

There are several piano solo versions of Tarkus. This is my favorite, performed by Massimo Bucci:

YouTube link.

[Sassy_Social_Share]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *